![]() ![]() ![]() But he couldn't avoid this album to be one of the poorest of the band. I have already mentioned that he is the glue It is not the first time that Iommi comes at the rescue to save an album. A fabulous guitar break will bring back the In this torrent of very average songs, the closing number stands out as a highlight. Close to the poorest "BJH" ones (yes, "Barclay James Harvest"). I just would have wished that "Sabbath" wouldn' t have Like "She's Gone" and its heavy.orchestrations is just a nighmare. But the miracle won't happened this time. Previous album but this one was saved by a few great songs. IMHHO, this was already noticeable on their The problem of this album resides in the song writting. More dynamic and at the end of the day a good rock piece of music. Not since it is my forteenth commented "Sabbath" review in twenty-four hours or so). Maybe more accessible for a "normal" human being (which I am More complex than most of "Sabbath" songs. It is hard to believe that this is a "Sabbath" song.Īnd next is "Gypsy". A syrupous ballad, at times rocky but best avoided, believe me. And to listen to another bad song won't take long. Highlight here (but we won't get tons like this.). Great melody, superb guitar solo and a very powerful and great keyboard work. Becauseįortunately, after the poor "Back Street Kids", the band will deliver a brilliant number : "You Won't Change Me". The least we can hope is that it is not the case with "Technical Ecstasy". Of the best song of an album as an opening track. If you are a bit familiar with "Sabbath" 's catalogue (which is not obvious on a prog site), you know that the band usually places one ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |